This text was obtained via automated optical character recognition.
It has not been edited and may therefore contain several errors.

---

It is probably not coincidental that another house shared the same legend with the Pirate House. This was known as Laurel Wood Plantation, located on Mulatto Bayou, a tributary of Pearl River. It was also believed to have been a transfer point of slaves. (This was built about 1800 by one of the Saucien^and eventually becamp the home of another Claiborne, being Colonel JFH Claiborne.) Tomoown inme development of Port Bienville in the early 1960’s, eye witness accounts have-recorded that there were “cages” wider the house.
All of the above notwithstanding, one must now inquire into that part of the legend
involving the persona of Jean Lafitte the Pirate. The name Lafitte appears a number of
times in the written records of Hancock County. Various spellings are evident: hi-foto: L a. f~f/ /(=>
Lafito, Laffiteaux, and Lafitto. These include official documents such as deeds, probate
Fecords, and census reports. The most curious records are dated substantially later than
the 1803-09 period, noted above as important years in the study of the slave trade.
Beginning in 1825 and going to 1850, there are no less than five deeds showing the real estate activity of Jean and Clarisse Lafitte. Even more interesting is the fact that the 1850 deed recites a sale of forty acres by Clarisse to Jean Defour. That document traces a chain of title to one Mary Parish, who in 1833 had been awarded 639 acres by the United States government. The acreage so described included the land on which sat the Pirate House.
ft would be easy to jump to a conclusion at this point, but a couple of unwelcome facts ?aise their heads. One is that Clarisse’s forty acres appears to have been located east of the Pirate House site, perhaps as distant as the shore of the bay. Another involves the date of death of Lafitte the pirate as probably 1825 or 1826, depending on which historian is selected. Believed to have been bom about 1780, the pirate would have been about 45 years old at the time of the 1825 purchase.
This does not square with the first mention of John la Fito, found in the 1820 census. At that time, he was between the ages of 16 and 26. The 1850 census is consistent with this, showing an age of John Lafiteaux as being between 40 and 50.
While it would appear that this was not our pirate, one cannot help but wonder whether there was a family connection. Besides Jean and Clarisse, Shieldsborough had Auguste and Marie Laffitte, also property owners. They had at least three children bom in the mid-1800’s, all baptized in the local Catholic church. There was also a slave of Auguste named Polomie, whose son was baptized in the same church and was christened Victor Laffitte. Mrs. Lafiteau (whether she was Marie ^Clarisse is not known) had a slave named S Rosine, who fathered a child also christened in the church; she named him Jean Wilfrane Lafiteau.	^
Relatives of the pirate? At best, we can only say perhaps. The disparity of ages does militate against any stronger assumption, but it is still instructive to follow Clarisse to her ^ . death, just in case she might have^the right Mrs. Lafitte. Her will, signed with an “X” on October 31, 1857 and probated on February 22, 1858, describes her property as being “300 feet deep and the same width as that of John Fayard.” This, which included her